Nebraska Supreme Court hears challenge to title of payday financing ballot effort

Nebraska Supreme Court hears challenge to title of payday financing ballot effort

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
  • SMS
  • E-mail

Nebraska voters could have the chance in November to choose whether cash loan organizations ought to be capped into the quantity of interest they could charge when it comes to loans that are small offer.

A petition that is successful place the measure, which may cap pay day loans at 36% instead of 400% as is presently permitted under state legislation, from the ballot.

However the owner of Paycheck Advance, one company that could be straight suffering from the alteration, stated such as the wording “payday financing” in the ballot name and explanatory statement as made by the Nebraska Attorney General’s workplace ended up being “insufficient and unfair.”

Trina Thomas sued Attorney General Doug Peterson and Secretary of State Bob Evnen, saying the language become printed in the ballot “unfairly casts the measure in a light that will prejudice the voter in support of the effort.”

Following the petition’s sponsors presented signatures to your Secretary of State’s workplace on June 25, it had been forwarded towards the attorney general to draft the ballot title and statement that is explanatory.

In line with the language came back by the Attorney General’s Office on 17, the ballot measure would read july:

A vote “FOR” will amend Nebraska statutes to: (1) decrease the amount that delayed deposit solutions licensees, also referred to as payday loan providers, may charge up to a maximum percentage that is annual of thirty-six percent; (2) prohibit payday lenders from evading this price limit; and (3) deem void and uncollectable any delayed deposit transaction produced in violation for this price limit.